By clicking ["Continue/Submit"], you agree that Astellas may contact you by email with information to help you connect with clinical trial sites. While we can connect you to clinical trial sites, we cannot answer questions about any investigational therapy through email. Your consent to receiving emails is not a requirement to participate in a clinical trial or study.  For more information, including how to unsubscribe at any time, see our

A study of mirabegron in young children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity

Mirabegron in Young Children Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study to learn how [14C]ASP0367 is processed by the body in healthy men

14C ASP0367 In Males Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study of Gilteritinib (ASP2215) Combined with Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3)/Internal Tandem Duplication (ITD) Positive Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Gilteritnib and Chemotherapy Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study to find the best dose of ASP5354 to show lymph nodes in people with breast cancer or melanoma during surgery

ASP5354 to Show Lymph Nodes Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study of Intravesical Enfortumab Vedotin For Treatment of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

Intravesical Enfortumab Vedotin for Bladder Cancer Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study of the safety and tolerability of ASP7317 in adults who are losing their clear, sharp central vision due to geographic atrophy secondary to dry age-related macular degeneration

ASP7317 for Geographic Atrophy Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study to Assess the Antitumor Activity, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Biomarkers of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) in Participants with Claudin (CLDN) 18.2 Positive, Metastatic or Advanced Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma

Zolbetuximab Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study of an Intratumoral Oncolytic Virus in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Solid Tumors

Intratumoral Oncolytic Virus Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study to Assess ASP0598 Otic Solution Following Topical Application in the Ear in Subjects with Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation (CTMP)

ASP058 Otic Solution Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study to evaluate ASP0367 in participants with primary mitochondrial myopathy

ASP0367 Study for Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study of ASP2138 in adults with stomach cancer or pancreatic cancer

ASP2138 Study for Stomach or Pancreatic Cancer | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study about how ASP5354 affects the body in healthy adults and in adults whose kidneys do not work well

ASP5354 for Healthy Adults and Adults with Poor Kidneys | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study for Subjects With Prostate Cancer Who Previously Participated in an Enzalutamide Clinical Study

Prostate Cancer Study for Previous Participation in Enzalutamide  | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IMAB362 in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine (Nab-P + GEM) as First Line Treatment in Subjects with Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) Positive, Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

IMAB362 with Nab P and GEM Study for Pancreatic Cancer  | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study of gilteritinib, venetoclax and azacitidine as a combined treatment for people newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia

Gilteritinib Venetoclax and Azacitidine Study for Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of ASP7517 in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Relapsed/Refractory Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

ASP7517 for Acute Myeloid Leukimia | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study to evaluate ASP0367 in participants with reduced maximum oxygen uptake due to poor systemic oxygen extraction

ASP0367 for Reduced Maxiumum Oxygen Uptake Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study of ASP3082 in adults with previously treated solid tumors

ASP3082 for Solid Tumors Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Study of ASP1570 in adults with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

ASP1570 for Advanced or Metastatic Tumors Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

Study of ASP7517 Alone and with Pembrolizumab in Participants with Advanced Solid Tumors Expressing WT1 Antigen

ASP7517 with Pembrolizumab Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A Safety Surveillance Study in Subjects with Macular Degenerative Disease Treated with Human Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Therapy

Macular Degenerative Disease Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

A study to evaluate mirabegron in pediatric participants from 5 to less than 18 years of age with overactive bladder (OAB)

Mirabegron Study in Children with OAB Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

Study of ASP0739 Alone and with Pembrolizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors with NY-ESO-1 Expression Participants

ASP0739 with Pembrolizumab Study For Solid Tumors| Astellas Clinical Trials

A study of ASP0367 in people with kidneys that do not work well and in healthy people

ASP0367 Study for Adults with Poor Kidneys | Astellas Clinical Trials

Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy alone in untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy Study | Astellas Clinical Trials

ABOUT CLINICAL TRIALS

FAQS

Have questions about or want more information about A Study of LY3471851 in Participants With Gastric Cancer? Contact us by filling out your information below and we’ll respond to you.

Purpose [I would like…]

Requestor Information [I am…]

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development.  Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared.  Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Participants received roxadustat three times a week (TIW) for at least 52 weeks up to a maximum of 104 weeks. Participants received initial dose of roxadustat in doses of 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg, according to the average weekly dose of epoetin or darbepoetin alfa prior to randomization. Participants' roxadustat dosage was adjusted every 4 weeks to maintain Hb level within the target range 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL. Dose adjustment steps were as follows: 20, 40, 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 400 mg. Oral iron treatment of 200 mg was allowed for supplementation to support erythropoiesis. Treatment with intravenous iron was allowed only if certain protocol criteria were met.

Participants received epoetin alfa once weekly, twice weekly or TIW and darbepoetin alfa once a week or once every other week. Participants were treated for at least 52 weeks up to a maximum of 104 weeks. Treatment dosage was adjusted according to the pre-specified rule of keeping the participant’s Hb levels between 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL. Participants were not allowed to switch from the epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa or vice versa.

1517-cl-0613-clrrs-02-disc01-en-final-02.pdf

1517-cl-0613-clls-disc01-en-final-02.pdf

NCT02278341_Prot_000.pdf

NCT02278341_SAP_001.pdf

This study was conducted to explore a new therapy for anemia in participants with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis. Anemia is a reduced number of red blood cells or hemoglobin. Hemoglobin (which contains iron) is important for the transport of oxygen in your blood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if roxadustat is effective and safe in the maintenance treatment of anemia in ESRD participants on stable dialysis. Roxadustat was compared to epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa, commercially available medicines for treatment of anemia.

Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients on Stable Dialysis

This study consisted of three study periods as follows: 
- Screening Period: up to 6 weeks 
- Treatment Period: a minimum of 52 weeks up to a maximum of 104 weeks 
- Follow-up Period: 4 weeks

CN CDE Number

EudraCT Number

jRCT Number

NCT ID

Patient Level Data

Product ST Name

Therapeutic Area

Participants received initial dose of roxadustat orally as a tablet in doses of 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg, according to the average weekly dose of epoetin or darbepoetin alfa prior to randomization. Participants' roxadustat dosage was adjusted every 4 weeks to maintain Hb level within the target range 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL. Dose adjustment steps were as follows: 20, 40, 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 400 mg. Oral iron treatment of 200 mg was allowed for supplementation to support erythropoiesis. Treatment with intravenous iron was allowed only if certain protocol criteria were met.

Participants received epoetin alfa via intravenous or subcutaneous injection, once a week, twice a week, or three times a week (TIW). Epoetin alfa dosage was adjusted to maintain Hb level within the target range. Dosing of epoetin alfa was per UK SmPC of Eprex®. Participants received IV iron supplementation according to the standard of care.

Participants received darbepoetin alfa via intravenous or subcutaneous injection, once a week or once every other week. Darbepoetin alfa dosage was adjusted to maintain Hb level within the target range. Dosing of darbepoetin alfa was per EU SmPC of Aranesp®. Participants received IV iron supplementation according to the standard of care.

Oral iron treatment was recommended for supplementation to support erythropoiesis and as first-line treatment for iron deficiency, unless participant was intolerant to this treatment. For participants receiving roxadustat the recommended daily dose was 200 mg of elemental iron. Participants were
advised to take roxadustat at least 1 hour before or 1 hour after oral iron. Intravenous iron
supplementation for participants receiving roxadustat was allowed if all of the following criteria were
met: The participant’s Hb level had not responded adequately to roxadustat following two consecutive
dose increases or reached the maximum dose limit, and participant’s ferritin was < 100 ng/mL (< 220
pmol/L) or TSAT < 20%, or the participant was intolerant of oral iron therapy. For participants treated
with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa, IV iron supplementation was given according to standard of care.

Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Site HU36007

Site GB44001

Site GB44081

Site ES34002

Site ES34030

Site BE32004

Site FR33050

Site RU70005

Site PT35139

Site ES34035

Site PT35127

Site RS38105

Site ES34011

Site PT35121

Site RS38117

Site RO40015

Site RO40004

Site BG35919

Site BE32017

Site ES34008

Site HU36046

Site HR38508

Site BE32003

Site HU36026

Site PL48004

Site GB44079

Site SK42119

Site HR38501

Site DE49049

Site HR38504

Site RS38104

Site RU70037

Site BG35907

Site BG35916

Site IT39032

Site DE49073

Site DE49054

Site RO40018

Site SK42102

Site FR33063

Site BE32002

Site GE99503

Site ES34009

Site SK42113

Site IT39010

Site BG35920

Site BE32011

Site BG35906

Site RU70014

Site ES34010

Site DE49002

Site PT35128

Site IT39008

Site ES34041

Site FR33055

Site RS38102

Site PT35114

Site PT35120

Site RU70073

Site PL48013

Site FR33008

Site RO40020

Site DE49070

Site SK42120

Site RU70050

Site FR33010

Site BG35924

Site DE49072

Site IT39040

Site PT35140

Site RU70008

Site ES34017

Site PT35117

Site PL48009

Site IT39028

Site RS38101

Site RU70030

Site CZ42015

Site ES34039

Site BG35921

Site BG35903

Site HU36006

Site BG35909

Site PL48014

Site BE32019

Site GB44080

Site RU70011

Site CZ42008

Site RS38103

Site HU36027

Site ES34037

Site BG35923

Site BG35915

Site RU70002

Site HU36003

Site IT39006

Site HU36036

Site BG35918

Site IT39022

Site RU70051

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat in the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease Patients on Stable Dialysis

The analysis population was the All Randomized population.

Age Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Race/Ethnicity, Customized

Baseline Hemoglobin (Hb) Value

Study Specific Measure

Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of four latest central laboratory Hb values prior or on the same date as first study drug intake (pre-dose).

Baseline Mean Hb

The analysis population was the All Randomized, which consisted of participants who were randomized into the study and had the available data.

Overall 838 were randomized to receive treatment. Two participants randomized to the pooled ESA treatment group were excluded due to GCP violations and their data was excluded. Total of 836 were considered randomized.

Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of four central laboratory Hb values; four latest Hb values prior or on the same date as the first study drug intake. For participants who did not have an available Hb value during the week 28-36 period, imputation rules were applied. For analyses without rescue therapy, participants who used rescue therapy after the initiation of rescue therapy were set to missing for 6 weeks from the start date of rescue therapy. If no Hb value was available, an imputation technique was used, with the mean of all available values from Day 1 to minimum (End of Efficacy Emergent Period) carried forward.

The model includes treatment arm, region, CV History, previous ESA treatment, visits and visit by treatment as categorical variables and baseline Hb and baseline Hb by visit as continuous variable.

The analysis population was the Per Protocol Set (PPS) which consisted of all Full Analysis Set (FAS) participants who did not meet any of exclusion criteria from the PPS. The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dose valid Hb assessment.

Change From Baseline (BL) to the Average Hemoglobin (Hb) in Weeks 28-36 Without Rescue Therapy [EU (EMA)]

Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of four central laboratory Hb values: four latest Hb values prior or on the same date as first study drug intake. Change from baseline to the average Hb are observed values. Missing hemoglobin data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) imputation model with treatment, baseline hemoglobin, randomization stratification factors and the available non missing hemoglobin for each scheduled week.

The model includes treatment arm, region, CV History, previous ESA treatment as categorical variables and baseline Hb as continuous variable. Statistical analysis used was ANCOVA model with multiple imputations (MI). Missing hemoglobin data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the MCMC imputation model.

The analysis population was the All Randomized, which consisted of participants who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had available data.

Change From BL to the Average Hb in Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue Therapy [US (FDA)]

Hb response during weeks 28–36, was defined as mean Hb from 10–12 g/dL without receiving rescue therapy in the 6 weeks prior to, or during, the evaluation period. The percentages and 95% CI were unadjusted, the exact method of Clopper-Pearson was used for 95% CI. The Efficacy Emergent Period was defined as the evaluation period from the Analysis date of first dose intake up to end of treatment (EOT) Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period).

A generalized linear model was used to estimate the difference in response rates between the arms, as an approximation for the Miettinen and Nurminen method, adjusting for following covariates: region, previous ESA treatment, cardiovascular history and baseline Hb as categorical variables.

Percentage of Participants with Hb Response During Weeks 28 to 36

Baseline LDL was defined as the LDL value on Day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used.

The analysis population was the FAS, with participants who had available data.